With the political races going on right now, we see a mass of coverage over each delegate. I often see very different opinions on each one from different news sources. I started thinking, if I only watched of listened to one news source, what would I think about the candidates. I started searching online for examples of media bias. i could not find as many examples as I thought I would but here they are.
![screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-27-27-pm](https://hmjsblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-27-27-pm.png?w=660)
In the photos above, the magazines portray the candidates differently in that Romney is labeled a “wimp” while all those who appose Obama are called “dumb”. This bias is so obvious I begin to wonder if it is sarcastic.
![screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-34-18-pm](https://hmjsblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-34-18-pm.png?w=660)
On these magazine covers, the Obama and Michele are portrayed in a positive light while Sarah Palin’s new grandchild is associated with “Lies and Scandals”.
![screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-29-55-pm](https://hmjsblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/screen-shot-2016-09-12-at-6-29-55-pm.png?w=660)
Here the Clinton’s new grandchild is called a “liberal crybaby”. This name calling of children is horrible. Any reporter that targets the child of a politician or celebrity in a negative way does not deserve to be published. Children should no be drug into the mess their parents have made.
I
I like this last picture simply because it shows how media can choose the facts you receive. You should always do your own research before you start arguing or believing.